The long -standing tension between OpenAI and Elon Musk became more visible with mutual legal steps. OpenAI, one of the most striking institutions in the artificial intelligence world, went directly to the court against Musk. The company described Musk’s behavior as “malicious ve and said that these attacks should be stopped.
In the counterclaim file submitted to the court, it was claimed that Musk’s systematic attacks on OpenAI aim to interrupt the development of the company. It was emphasized that these attacks were not limited to criticism, but extended to direct intervention attempts. One of the most remarkable points was the purchase proposal that OpenAI described as “fake”.
OpenAI: Elon Musk’s offer was a show
The OpenAI administration described Musk’s $ 97.4 billion proposal as a demonstration attempt to disrupt the stability of the company. It was suggested that the proposal did not have any real interest in the company’s vision or structure. With the reflection of this proposal to the public, it was pointed out that Musk’s intention emerged more clearly.
Musk’s criticism of OpenAI is not new, but its objections to the commercialization of the company have been known for a long time. In 2015, he argued that OpenAI, which was a founding partner, remained as a non -profit organization. However, over the years, artificial intelligence investments needed great capital had changed this structure.
Although Musk sees this transformation as “betrayal of the mission ,, OpenAI shared documents that he had supported this transformation process in the past. A blog post published in December 2024 included e-mails and offers for Musk’s transition to the company’s commercial structure. With these documents, the company thinks that Musk can refute today’s claims.
In addition to all these, OpenAI’s lawyers argued that Musk’s behavior did not only target the company, but also harm the artificial intelligence development process in general. It was stated that such behaviors create insecurity at the sectoral level and interrupted the works carried out for the public interest. The inconsistency between Musk’s discourses and his actions was also pointed out.
Musk’s previous case withdrew in June 2024, but was re -filed in August. In these cases, the basic argument was deviated from OpenAI’s target of “developing network for the benefit of humanity”. On the other hand, the OpenAI management argues that this goal is still valid and that the commercial structure and public benefit can be carried out together.
Within the scope of the counterclaim, OpenAI demanded legal regulations that would prevent Musk from having similar attacks in the future. The company also wants to be held responsible for the damages caused by Musk. It was reported that the judicial process will begin in the spring of 2026.