Google, artificial intelligence data services, which provides Scale AI, was allegedly preparing to end the business relationship. According to Reuters, this year, a payment of approximately $ 200 million to SCALE AI was planned. However, it is stated that these plans have been canceled and the internet giant has started negotiations with other suppliers. Google refused to comment on the subject, chose to maintain silence.
Not only Google, but also Microsoft is said to evolve in a similar direction. According to Reuters, OpenAI has restructured its relationship with Scale AI a few months ago. Although OpenAI’s Financial Affairs Director says that Scale is still one of the companies they work for, it is noteworthy that the weight is reduced. These developments reveal that large companies in the field of artificial intelligence have chosen data providers more meticulously.
Uncomfortable with Google Meta’s Scale AI investment
Meta’s $ 14.3 billion investment in Scale AI seems to have accelerated this process. With this investment, Meta became a partner of 49 percent of Scale AI, while CEO Alexandr Wang began to take an active role in artificial intelligence attempts under the roof of Meta. This has created question marks for other customers. Because it is now more questioned whether the data will be processed impartially.
Scale AI is one of the leading providers in the field of data labeling and artificial intelligence training. Institutions such as the US government and autonomous vehicle developers are among the customers of the company. However, the main large customer base, producer artificial intelligence is composed of companies that develop. These companies see the correct labeling of complex and precise data as a critical need.
Trust in basic infrastructure services such as data labeling is at the center of commercial relations. The fact that Meta has an important share has caused controversy on Scale AI’s independence. It is thought that large technology companies have taken back back. Because in this environment, as well as the data, who shares that data is gaining importance.
On the other hand, statements from the Scale AI front argue that there is no change in the company’s security policy. The company states that it continues to protect its customers’ data and will continue to operate as an independent structure. However, the impact of the investments on the perception can overshadow such explanations. Customers question the effect of corporate ownership structure on data impartiality.
However, the fact that companies like Google start negotiations with new data suppliers show that new balances may occur in the market. It seems likely that alternative data service providers will rise. Increased competition can lead to new standards in both price and data safety. This can cause a quality -oriented break in the sector.
In addition to all these, OpenAI’s tendency to work with different suppliers points out that the level of dependence in the sector is redefined. In this process, not only the technical capabilities of the big companies, but also their corporate structures have become the criterion of evaluation. This increases the expectations of transparency and accountability in terms of data providers. In the technology sector, not only the quality of service, but also to whom that service belongs to.