The long -term case between Google and Epic Games continues to determine the agenda of the world of technology. Fortnite’s developer Epic had initiated the process by objecting to the restrictive applications of the Google Play Store. At the end of the four years, Google received a serious legal defeat. The company is now headed to the Supreme Court to change this picture.
The decision in October 2024 is forcing Google to open the Play Store to third -party stores for three years. This decision is expected to enter into force on October 17 and Google is trying to stop the process. The company, which requesting a postponement of the execution from the Supreme Court, then wants the case to be examined extensively. Google, which can not find the desired result in the appeal phase, now feels the necessity to apply to the highest authority. In addition, the idea that the decision will directly shake the business model makes the company even more worried.
Google argues that the decision taken in the epic case will raise serious security risks
Many technical reasons stand out in the documents offered by Google to the Supreme Court. The company argues that the increase in third -party stores will directly threaten user security. It is stated that platforms that contain malware or offer pirate content can spread rapidly. In addition, it is emphasized that developers will make great efforts to prevent their applications from taking part in different stores unannounced. Such a table means a heavy burden for both developers and users.
Google also criticizes the decision economically. The Play Store often reminds us that it is not just a payment infrastructure. He says that many services such as security, distribution, update and support are part of this ecosystem. Nevertheless, the decision can lead to developers not paying while benefiting from these services. This situation will create instability in the market in the long run.
The case against Epic Games caused significant losses for Google. The company not only allows third -party stores, but also cannot make agreements that make the Play Store predetermined on devices. In addition, it is also prohibited to force developers to google’s own billing system. Thus, Epic has made most of his demands accept. This table is carefully monitored in the technology sector.
The case between Apple and Epic had a different result. Epic was only able to achieve a partial gain here. In the case against Google, much wider results appeared. For this reason, two cases are constantly compared in the technology press. Google’s loss is much more comprehensive than Epic has achieved against Apple.
Google’s expectation is to postpone the three -year expansion with the stopping of the execution. The company wants to save time and strengthen its defense. It then aims to reconsider the case with all the details. Nevertheless, the attitude of the Supreme Court remains uncertain. Previously, both Apple and Google have made similar applications and rejected.
This time, the possibility of a different possibility is due to the scope of the decision. This result, which directly affects Google’s business model, is separated from previous cases. Therefore, the evaluation of the High Court may change. However, it is not possible to draw a clear picture right now. Google’s priority is to postpone the decision by making time.
Epic Games argues that this decision is useful for competition. The company emphasizes that the distribution of developers in different stores offers the user options. In addition, the increase in competition is thought to improve quality. Nevertheless, security risks are expressed by many segments. This contradiction shows that discussions will not end easily.
The case between Google and Epic has a meaning beyond the two companies. The results that will change the functioning of the mobile application ecosystem are on the agenda. Developer rights, user security and control of large companies are discussed in the same framework. The decision of the Supreme Court in the coming period may reshape the balance of the sector.