US -based AnthropicIn the copyright case opened with authors 1.5 billion dollars He agreed to pay. About the book $ 3,000 (approximately 123,000 ₺) payment will be made and a total of nearly half a million works will be covered.
Court’s approval is required for the formalization of this compromise and the preliminary approval hearing 8 September 2025 will be made on the date. If the court approves the agreement, the authors participating in the case will have given up their individual rights demands. In addition, the agreement may increase according to the number of participation and the total payment may exceed $ 1.5 billion. Therefore, the case has not only been a payment process and became a new threshold in the royalties. However, the process will continue until the court approval.
Anthropic announced that he would destroy all the files and copies downloaded within the scope of the case. But this agreement covers only past actions. No permission was given for possible royalties after 25 August 2025. In addition, compromise does not provide a license or freedom for the future activities of the company. Thus, any future usage can be the subject of the judicial process. This is seen as an important warning for artificial intelligence companies.
The case filed by the authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber and Kirk Wallace Johnson in 2024 began with the allegation that the content obtained from illegal book libraries were used in AI education. The company decided to “fair use için from the court for the training performed through the purchased works. ButA separate case was filed against the use of pirate content. In this process, a federal judge in California ruled that writers could sue a collective lawsuit. In spite of everything, the expansion of the case was prevented by compromise.
Anthropic prevented the progress of the process by agreeing with the authors
Following the decision in California, thousands of writers were included in the case, stating that their works were taken from pirate libraries. Reconciliation enabled these authors to be collectively represented. With it Together, the documents that emerged during the trial process showed that artificial intelligence companies pushed boundaries while collecting data. If this compromise comes into play with the approval of the court, the authors’ claims of rights will be eliminated. Therefore, the case is not only an issue of copyright, but also in terms of data usage methods.
Anthropic said in a statement, “This agreement solves the allegations from the past,” the statements were used. The company announced that they will continue to develop safe artificial intelligence. Nevertheless, no misconduct was accepted in the statement. In addition, the company reiterated its goal of contributing to scientific progress in the future. However, the allegations in the case file aroused a wide repercussion in the public. Therefore, the agreement was not only a financial obligation, but also a message given to the public.
The total amount to be paid within the framework of compromise is determined as 1.5 billion dollars. However, if the number of participation in the case increases, payment of $ 3,000 will be paid for each additional work. This may lead to the total cost to over 1.5 billion dollars. In addition, this figure means the highest compensation in the history of copyright cases in the USA. Therefore, the result of the case will be a turning point not only for Anthropic, but for the entire artificial intelligence sector.
There was a great uncertainty about the source of the data used for artificial intelligence training. With this case, it was clear that the data obtained from pirate sources may have serious legal consequences. On the other hand, other major companies such as OpenAI and Meta may also face similar processes. In any case, this decision in the United States may constitute a precedent in other countries. This can lead to the beginning of new debates on a global scale.
Anthropic is a company that stands out with its investments from giants such as Amazon and Google. Nevertheless, in recent years, different copyright cases have been faced. In 2023, Universal Music accused the company of using royalty lyrics without permission. Reddit filed a lawsuit in the summer of 2024, claiming that Anthropic’s boots provided unauthorized access. In addition to all these, this agreement with the authors was the biggest financial obligation of the company. This table shows that artificial intelligence companies have grown under legal pressure.
Providing information for right holders Anthropiccopyrightsettlement.com A website named. The full list of the works included in the case through this site can be displayed. In addition, the right holders will be able to get information about the compensation processes through the site. If the court approval is given, the payment schedule and details will be announced on this site again. Thus, authors who want to participate in the process will easily reach information. This practice contributes to the transparent execution of the case.
This development once again revealed that the tension between the creative sector and the artificial intelligence companies has increased. Especially the lack of clear rules on how to use royalties in AI education stands out as a major problem. Therefore, this decision in the United States may have the international reflections in the long run. In addition to all these, the result of this case has opened a new page in copyright debates.